adsubzero, December 10, 2021, that was just a stupid comparison. The digitization of audio is a revolution because it... more men are not a stupid comparison, but very real. It will end in this way,

adsubzero, December 10, 2021, that was just a stupid comparison. The digitization of audio is a revolution because it... more yes, just forgot to mention this-I am glad that the manufacturer no longer provides us with headphones in the box, even if it is a scum Move, but after abandoning the headphone jack and then not even giving the adapter, they should also give us wireless headphones. Not type c wired, but wireless. That said, of course, if the purpose is to migrate to a new wireless standard, it is not. They only care about profit, and any other nonsense that they claim about saving the environment or making things more convenient for consumers is a complete lie. The manufacturer will not provide any services to customers.

CptPower, December 9, 2021, you are so interesting. Vinyl boards were replaced by audio cassettes and video cassettes. Then there is the CD... more This is just a stupid comparison. Audio digitization is a revolution because it is excellent in every aspect-convenience, quality and lower cost. Vinyl is now only used by those looking for nostalgia. In contrast, wireless beats are only wired in convenience departments, which only applies to audio. Wireless file transfer still lags behind wired, because the implementation is far from seamless. The quality/speed will never reach wired. When the proposed alternative is at least not as good as the original one, there is no point in migrating to it. Abandoning the 3.5mm jack has no effect other than reducing the manufacturer's cost. Same as any other decision to renounce functionality.

YUKI93, December 9, 2021, the so-called "e-waste" is still related to faster, more...more people, more interesting. Vinyl boards were replaced by audio cassettes and video cassettes. Then CD, then DVD, and now Blu-ray or Internet streaming. Sooner or later, physical objects will no longer be needed for watching and listening to music or videos. Same here. The wired earbuds you want are not just the old technology of the past, now it is slowly consumed by wireless technology, and until it is forgotten, it can only be found in shops that still sell old technology at high prices. It will be the same.

GAMIRSFM, December 7, 2021. This is a sad moment. Mid-range phones do not have a headphone jack, and the next one is low-end phones...More headphones still exist

Yuri84, goodbye Pixel 6a on December 8, 2021, I don't know you at all, and I won't miss you. I just miss headphones...more cringe

adsubzero, 09 Dec 2021 What is the problem? Everyone I know uses cables to transfer files between Andro... More totally agree. For phones that don’t support microSD cards, I always use a cable to transfer files to my laptop. I never use any type of wireless connection for this purpose, not even cloud storage and Wi-Fi Direct. They are not as fast and seamless as cables.

Jbis, let me ask you a serious question on December 9, 2021. Among all the people in the world who own a smart phone, ho... more What is the problem? Everyone I know uses cables to transfer files between Android phones and their PCs. Maybe you don't need to do this often, but there is no seamless wireless way to do this.

YUKI93, December 9, 2021, the so-called "e-waste" is still related to faster, more...more, let me ask you a serious question. Of all the people in the world who have smartphones, how many people do you think actually connect their phones to computers, or actually use them to transfer files?

YUKI93, December 9, 2021, the so-called "e-waste" is still more relevant to faster, more...more 100% agreement with you. Of course, wireless connections will continue to evolve every once in a while, but in terms of delay, delay, or input delay, for now, it is far less capable than wired connections. Most people around the world are still using wired connection devices.

I tried to hold the Pixel 6a in my hand. Due to its shape, this is the most embarrassing and uncomfortable feeling when I hold the phone.

CptPower, you can't speak to everyone on December 8, 2021. So please don't act like a sheriff or something. Your... More so-called "e-waste" is still more relevant to faster and more stable connections. Until the day when wireless connections can at least keep up with wired connections in terms of speed and latency, whether it is audio or file transfer or battery charging, please continue to dream of wireless becoming the future. If anything, wireless may disappear and become extinct.

Rae, December 8, 2021 This may sound crazy, but why can't they put the port on the back of the t...More I know that you can put the button on the back, which is not the most in my opinion Good idea, but it is definitely best to put the fingerprint scanner on the back as before. But how to place the port on the back of the phone? Then the phone must be very thick to accommodate the length of the connector. Pointless. As for the thickness, the phone is already very thin, and it doesn't make sense to be thinner. To be fair, the thickness of mobile phones has been roughly the same for some time. Instead, the problem is length and width. Today's mobile phones are too long and too wide to be practical on the go. You can also gain weight. Due to the increase in size and excessive use of glass, mobile phones have become heavier and heavier. Likewise, polymers (ie plastics) will be cheaper and more practical, because everyone will end up using polymer housings instead of glass. But most people are too stupid and don't care about practicality, which affects those who don't.

YUKI93, December 8, 2021 lol, the comment section here disagrees with your comment. Don't say... More folks, you can't speak from everyone. So please don't act like a sheriff or something. Your opinion is your opinion, not everyone agrees. Since wireless technology was first used more than 100 years ago, wireless is the future. Cables are just more electronic waste.

More dead meat from Google.

Tio, December 8, 2021, they said it was to make the phone slimmer! This is to make the phone waterproof, they... more This may sound crazy, but if they really want to make the phone thinner, why can't they put the port on the back of the phone. I have never seen a smartphone with ports and buttons on the back of the body. It may ruin the aesthetics and design wisely. But at least they can still use it on their phones. Nowadays, ports and buttons are usually placed on the side of the phone, why is there only a camera on the back? If they put it there, it might be useful to users, not just a blank space. I always prioritize features and dedicated ports, not just the beautiful design of the smartphone.

Goodbye Pixel 6a, I don't know you at all, I won't miss you. I just miss the headphone jack, it was brutally murdered over and over again, just to rise from the ashes like a phoenix. My latest phone is the A52, and I plan to keep it until I find a significantly better phone. With headphone jack. Moreover, I hope it is a telephoto lens, not an "oh, so useful" ultra-wide-angle lens. I have used it before.

Tio, December 8, 2021, they said it was to make the phone slimmer! This is to make the phone waterproof... More ironically, the smallest flagship product has both a headphone jack and an ip68 waterproof function. Yes zenfone 8. In addition, xperia 5ii/5iii is also quite small. Ironically, the smallest flagship store there still retains the headphone jack. Completely contrary to common sense

Tio, December 8, 2021, they said it was to make the phone slimmer! This is to make the phone waterproof...More fortunately, people with real knowledge will think of removing the headphone jack on the smartphone. It’s not just you who have the idea, even technical YouTube users*. *https://youtu.be/bJG37Z9wPFQ

Anonymossy, December 8, 2021 Eh. Removing the headphone jack is not terrible news, but I already know it will...More about the camera I can agree. In the final analysis, this is all about photo processing algorithms. If the photo output quality doesn't look like a real camera, then it doesn't make sense to provide a 200MP sensor.

Home News Comment Comparison Coverage Glossary FAQ RSS Feed Youtube Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2000-2021 GSMArena.com Mobile version of the Android application Contact us Privacy Terms of Use Change Ads Agree not to sell my data